X’s Lawsuit Regarding Data Scraping Dismissed
A federal judge in California reportedly dismissed a lawsuit for breach-of-contract and tort claims brought by Elon Musk’s X, formerly known as Twitter, against Bright Data, in a case involving data scraping.
X reportedly alleged that Bright Data was taking data from its platform and selling it, employing methods to evade X’s anti-scraping technology, and violating its terms of service and copyright.
Data scraping is the process of extracting large volumes of data from publicly available web sources. The data is cleaned and prepared for processing and can serve several purposes such as training artificial intelligence models, targeting online advertisements, or conducting market research.
According to X, Bright Data was going to elaborate measures to evade its anti-scraping technology, and in doing so, violated X’s user agreement.
While data-scraping is controversial, the judge cautioned of the potential information monopoly and the disservice to the public if social media companies were to enjoy an unchecked authority over the use of public data. Ultimately, the judge rejected X’s argument of de facto copyright ownership over user-generated content made available to the public.
Bright Data CEO, Or Lenchner, reportedly made the following statement after hearing the decision: “Bright Data has proven that ethical and transparent scraping practices for legitimate business use and social good initiatives are legally sound. Companies that try to control user data intended for public consumption will not win this legal battle.”
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Sportswear Brand Sues University Over Similarities in Merchandise
As reported by the Associated Press, Columbia Sportswear has sued Columbia University, claiming that the university infringed the sportswear company’s trademark and breached an agreement between the… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Call Dropped: Verizon Cuts Deal in $175M Patent Clash
Verizon and Headwater Research LLC have reportedly agreed to settle a patent infringement lawsuit that ended with a $175 million USD jury verdict against the telecom giant. Headwater, a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Nintendo Secures Copyright Victory in China
In a recent copyright infringement case, the Jiangsu High Court ruled in favor of Nintendo, awarding the company approximately $28,000 USD, or 200,000 RMB, and an injunction against an unnamed… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Regulatory Updates – Impacts of Global Tariffs on Pharmaceuticals
Recent tariff measures affecting pharmaceutical products and ingredients have introduced new compliance and cost considerations for manufacturers, distributors, and importers operating in Canada and… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
US Appeals Court: Supertramp Songwriter Must "Give a Little Bit"
As reported by Reuters, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that Roger Hodgson, the former Supertramp singer and songwriter, must compensate three former band members for a share of… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Fallout from Trade Secret Theft in Taiwan
As reported by Reuters, three former employees of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company ("TSMC") were charged with violating security law and other offences in Taiwan. The prosecutors have…