Background
The Registrar’s split decision to allow Schneider Electric Industries SAS (“Schneider”) to register the trademark “WISER” was released on September 11, 2019. According to s. 56 of the Trademarks Act, each party has two months from the date on which notice is given to the parties from the Registrar to contest the decision, giving the parties until November 25, 2019. Schneider appealed by November 25, 2019. Spectrum Brands failed to do so, and moved for an extension of time on February 21, 2020.
The motion judge found that Spectrum had failed to establish two of the four criteria that must be considered on a motion for an extension of time, as set out in Canada (Attorney General) v Hennelly, [1999] F.C.J. No. 846 (F.C.A.) (“Hennelly”), namely, Spectrum failed to: show a continuing intention to pursue its appeal; and provide a reasonable explanation for the delay in bringing the proposed appeal.
The FCA’s Decision
Spectrum failed to show a continuing intention to pursue its appeal
Spectrum argued that the motion judge erred in failing to appreciate that the proposed appeal was a cross-appeal of the Registrar’s decision and, as a result, the starting point for the inquiry into whether it had a continuing intention to bring the proposed appeal was the filing of Schneider’s Notice of Application on November 25, 2019, not the date of the Registrar’s decision. It also claimed that the motion judge failed to account for the overriding consideration that justice be done between the parties, even in cases where one of the four Hennelly criteria is not satisfied. The FCA rejected both arguments.
The FCA noted that even if it accepted Spectrum’s argument that the delay for brining the proposed appeal should be calculated as of November 25, 2019, this was hardly evidence of Spectrum’s alleged continuing intention to file an appeal of the Registrar’s decision.
Spectrum failed to provide a reasonable explanation for its delay
The FCA further concluded that Spectrum had failed to provide a reasonable explanation for its delay in bringing the motion for an extension of time.
Spectrum claimed its delay was because it learned of Schneider’s intention to appeal right before the Christmas holidays, but the FCA was unconvinced. The FCA agreed with the motion judge that “there is nothing inherently unpredictable about the period surrounding statutory holidays, parties to a litigation being expected to be aware of them and to plan and work within time frames that include such holidays.” Furthermore, there was no explanation for the six week period between the end of the holiday season and the date on which Spectrum sought an extension of time.
The FCA affirmed the motion judge’s decision, and dismissed Spectrum’s appeal.
Author: Shannon Skillings
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property
Goodmans Wins Leading IP Law Firm – IP Patents at the Lexology Awards: North America 2024
We are proud to share Goodmans has won Leading IP Law Firm - IP Patents at the Lexology Awards: North America 2024. These awards celebrate outstanding achievements and world class client… -
Intellectual Property
Protecting Heads and the Ideas Inside: Yamaha’s Augmented Reality Helmet
A Yamaha patent application has been published for a new design of an augmented reality (AR) motorcycle helmet. The design introduces transparent lenses, which aim to combine the power of the AR… -
Intellectual Property
Bad Bunny Hops into Legal Battle Over Concert Clips
Bad Bunny has reportedly sued a concertgoer for uploading extensive footage of his Utah concert to YouTube. The legal action, filed in California, marks a rare escalation in disputes typically… -
Intellectual Property
Food for Thought: IP Battle Over Butter Chicken
The Delhi High Court reportedly had its initial hearing of Rupa Gujral and Ors v. Daryaganj Hospitality Private Limited and Ors in early 2024. The plaintiff, a famous restaurant chain, Moti Mahal… -
Intellectual Property
Keeping Up With Counterfeits: Kim Kardashian Sued For Knock-Off Dining Tables
Kim Kardashian and her interior design firm, Clements Design, are reportedly being sued by the Judd Foundation for promoting “cheap knockoffs” of one of Judd’s most renowned designs, a dining table… -
Intellectual Property
Mbappé Attempts to Trademark Soccer Celebration Pose
French soccer star, Kylian Mbappé, has sought trademark protection over a logo depicting his iconic goal celebration. The logo is a black and white image of Mbappé standing with his hands tucked…