Canada Expands Misleading Advertising Rules and Creates New Private Litigation for Misleading Advertising
The Government of Canada has proposed legislation to amend the Competition Act (the “Act”) to, among other things, (i) expand the scope of what constitutes misleading advertising, and (ii) permit private parties to commence civil litigation against alleged misleading advertising (and seek different types of monetary awards in some circumstances). These changes create new compliance obligations and strategic considerations for advertisers in Canada.
Here are four things to know about this new legislation and misleading advertising in Canada:
New Type of Misleading Advertising – Environmental Claims
At present, the Act’s civil provisions provide that advertising can be “misleading” if it is “misleading in a material respect” or if it makes claims related to the “performance, efficacy or length of life of a product that is not based on an adequate and proper test thereof, the proof of which lies on the” advertiser. It can be difficult to establish that environmental claims in advertising are material to a purchaser’s decision to select a product (especially if the claims concern, for example, the effect of the product’s manufacture on the environment). It can also be difficult to establish that environmental claims in advertising relate to the performance of a product (e.g., the claim related to the product’s manufacture does not concern any aspect of the product’s performance). This has limited the applicability of the misleading advertising provisions to so-called “greenwashing claims”. Under the new legislation, misleading advertising will be expanded to include claims concerning “a product’s benefits for protecting the environment” or a product’s benefits for “mitigating the environmental and ecological effects of climate change,” if those claims are not based on adequate prior testing.
Key Takeaways
- Advertising that contains environmental claims, including so-called “greenwashing claims” that convey an impression about the positive environmental benefit of a product or service, can contravene the Act even if they do not materially influence a purchasing decision or concern the performance of a product.
- Advertisers will need to assess carefully if they have “adequate and proper” testing in hand before making environmental claims.
New Private Litigation for Misleading Advertising, Including Monetary Penalties and Awards
At present, only the Commissioner of Competition has standing to challenge advertising as misleading and contrary to the civil provisions of the Act. Under the new legislation, private parties can seek leave from the Competition Tribunal to bring proceedings alleging that advertising is misleading and contrary to the Act. However, the Tribunal will only grant such leave if the Tribunal “is satisfied that it is in the public interest to do so.”
Private parties that obtain leave can use the existing legislation to request that the Tribunal order that an advertiser pay an administrative monetary penalty (which is due to the government). In addition, and only if private parties successfully prove that advertising is misleading in a material respect, private parties can use the existing legislation to request that the Tribunal issue an order that the advertiser “pay an amount, not exceeding the total of the amounts paid to the [advertiser] for the products in respect of which the conduct was engaged in, to be distributed among the persons to whom the products were sold… in any manner that the court considers appropriate.”
Key Takeaways
- Private parties can challenge all types of misleading advertising, if the Tribunal accepts that such a challenge is in the public interest.
- The ability to obtain a financial award that is to be distributed to third parties, including persons other than the plaintiffs (such as all consumers that purchased a product), may create incentives for the class-action plaintiff’s bar to attempt to launch misleading advertising litigation.
New Enforcement Abilities for Breach of Consent Agreements
At present, many misleading advertising investigations by the Commissioner are resolved via a consent agreement with an advertiser. However, it is challenging for the Commissioner to take action against alleged breaches of those consent agreements. The new legislation makes enforcement by the Commissioner significantly simpler. The new legislation permits the Commissioner to apply to a court or the Tribunal for civil enforcement of the consent agreement, including an order to prohibit advertisers from engaging in conduct that breaches the consent agreement and an “administrative monetary penalty in an amount not exceeding $10,000 for each day in which they fail to comply with the agreement…”
Key Takeaway
- It will be significantly easier for the Commissioner to take enforcement action against advertisers that breach consent agreements.
New Processes for Settling Private Misleading Advertising Litigation
Under the new legislation, all settlements of private misleading advertising litigation must be served on the Commissioner. The new legislation creates a process for the Commissioner to apply to the Tribunal to vary or rescind the settlement agreement if the agreement “is not in conformity with the purposes of” the misleading advertising sections of the Act. The language in this new legislation is vague, and so the Commissioner’s actual scope to challenge a settlement agreement is unclear. Separately, settling parties are permitted to have their settlement agreement registered with the Tribunal, which will result in it becoming publicly accessible. The new legislation gives the Commissioner the right to enforce a privately negotiated consent agreement as if it were the Commissioner that had entered into that consent agreement.
Key Takeaway
- Given the multitude of processes that apply to the settlement of private misleading advertising litigation, achieving acceptable terms of settlement may be made more complex.
Looking Forward
The proposed legislation is contained in the Government’s budget and is expected to become law late this year or early next year. While the new expanded definition of misleading advertising and the Commissioner’s ability to enforce breaches of consent agreements will come into force immediately, the new processes for private litigation will not come into effect until one year after the legislation becomes law.
For further information concerning this draft legislation, please contact any member of our Competition and Foreign Investment Group.
Expertise
Authors
Insights
-
Competition and Foreign Investment
Just Watch Me, Canadian Competition Law Review 2025
Kate McNeece co-authored the article "Just Watch Me: Procedural Fairness Under the Investment Canada Act's National Security Regime" for Canadian Competition Law Review 2025. This article investigates… -
Competition and Foreign Investment
The Investment Canada Act in Rapidly Changing Times
The decision of the U.S. government to at least temporarily impose 25% tariffs on most Canadian exports raises novel questions about the treatment of U.S. investments into Canada. This update… -
Competition and Foreign Investment
Competition Bureau Continues Enforcement Against Restrictive Covenants in Grocery Leases
The Competition Bureau announced yesterday that it has entered into an agreement with Empire Company (the parent company of Sobeys, IGA and others grocery chains) to remove a ‘property control’ that… -
Capital Markets
Canada Initiates Consultations and Proposes New Measures to Strengthen Anti-Modern Slavery Efforts
The Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act (the “Act”) came into force on January 1, 2024, implementing enhanced reporting requirements for certain entities to combat… -
Competition and Foreign Investment
The Cineplex Decision – A New Chapter Opens in Canadian Competition Law
The Competition Tribunal released its reasons in Commissioner v. Cineplex on October 3, 2024. It is the first decision under the Competition Act’s “drip pricing” misleading advertising provision… -
Competition and Foreign Investment
Canadian Government’s Approval of Glencore/Teck and a Ministerial Statement Signals Muscular New Standards for Investment Canada Act Undertakings and Metals and Minerals Transactions
Executive SummaryA recent approval under the Investment Canada Act (“ICA”), and a policy statement by the Minister, signals important developments for investors into Canada, including:The…
Featured Work
-
Aging and Health Care
Welltower to acquire Amica Senior Lifestyles portfolio for $4.6 billion
Goodmans is advising Welltower Inc. in connection with its announced acquisition of a portfolio of senior housing communities from Amica Senior Lifestyles and Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan for… -
Mining
Coeur Mining, Inc. acquires SilverCrest Metals Inc. at an implied equity value of approximately US$1.7 billion
Goodmans LLP acted as Canadian counsel to Coeur Mining, Inc. in connection with its acquisition of SilverCrest Metals Inc., whereby pursuant to a plan of arrangement Coeur acquired all of the issued… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Apotex acquires CanPrev
Goodmans LLP acted for Apotex Inc. in connection with its acquisition of CanPrev, a leading Canadian provider of vitamins, supplements, and other natural health products… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Ryan, LLC completes acquisition of Altus Group’s Property Tax Services business
Goodmans LLP acted for Ryan, LLC in connection with its C$700 million acquisition of the global property tax services business of Altus Group Limited, a provider of asset and fund intelligence for… -
Real Estate
Canadian Tire Corporation sells Brampton industrial property to Prologis for C$258 million
Goodmans LLP represented Canadian Tire Corporation, Limited on the sale of its 90-acre industrial property in Brampton to Prologis Inc. for C$258 million… -
Competition and Foreign Investment
TRADER Corporation acquired by AutoScout24
Goodmans LLP acted as Canadian regulatory counsel for TRADER Corporation in connection with its acquisition by AutoScout24 (a portfolio company of Hellman & Friedman) from Thoma Bravo…
News & Events
-
Aging and Health Care
The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory 2025 Once Again Recognizes Goodmans
We are proud to announce Goodmans LLP continues to be recognized in the 2025 edition of The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory.Congratulations to the 96 Goodmans lawyers recognized as leaders across… -
Competition and Foreign Investment
Kate McNeece host of CBA’s Counterfactual Podcast: Fair Trade?: North American Competitiveness, Tariffs and Trade with Professor Meredith Lilly
Goodmans Counsel Kate McNeece hosts CBA’s Counterfactual podcast episode 22, Fair Trade?: North American Competitiveness, Tariffs and Trade with Professor Meredith Lilly. Kate McNeece speaks with… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Goodmans Advises Welltower Inc. in Connection with its Acquisition of a portfolio from Amica Senior Lifestyles and Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan
Goodmans is advising Welltower Inc. in connection with its announced acquisition of a portfolio of senior housing communities from Amica Senior Lifestyles and Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan for…