First Conviction under the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act
The first conviction under the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (the “Act”) has recently been issued, raising many important considerations for Canadian companies conducting business abroad. In R. v. Karigar, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice convicted Nazir Karigar of agreeing to offer a bribe to a foreign official contrary to section 3(1)(b) of the Act.
Background
Much of the evidence at trial consisted of testimony from a co-conspirator who was granted immunity for cooperating with the Crown. In reaching its decision, the Court made the following findings of fact.
In 2005, Mr. Karigar approached Cryptometrics Canada, a Kanata-based tech company, and advised them that Air India was seeking a technology solution for certain air security issues, and that Cryptometrics’ facial recognition technology might be a viable solution. Ultimately, Cryptometrics established a subsidiary in India and Mr. Karigar was hired by Cryptometrics as the executive director of the subsidiary for the purposes of securing a contract with Air India.
Eventually, Mr. Karigar suggested to Cryptometrics that it needed to pay various bribes in order to help secure the contract, which Air India had put out to tender. Mr. Karigar believed that paying bribes, including to certain persons at Air India and the Indian Minister of Civil Aviation, was a necessary part of doing business in India. Cryptometrics agreed with Mr. Karigar that he should offer bribes as he recommended. Mr. Karigar then offered the bribes, and Cryptometrics advanced funds to Mr. Karigar to make the bribes.
It was unclear whether or not the bribes were in fact ever received by the intended recipients, and, in the end, Cryptometrics did not get contract. Nonetheless, the Court convicted Mr. Karigar of an offence under the Act.
Key Points for Canadian Companies
The Court’s decision raises important points for Canadian companies to consider when conducting business abroad.
First, the Court held that section 3 of the Act includes a conspiracy offence, and that therefore the mere existence of the conspiracy to pay a bribe was sufficient to warrant a conviction. According to the trial judge, it was not necessary for the Crown to prove that (i) a bribe was actually paid; or (ii) the foreign public official actually agreed to accept the bribe. Rather, the Crown must only prove that the accused believed that a bribe was being paid. Thus, unless the decision is reversed on appeal, an agreement between business associates to bribe a foreign official can itself constitute an offence under the Act.
Second, the category of individuals who may be considered a “foreign public official” is broad, and can include employees of state controlled/sponsored entities even where the entity carries out purely private-sector commercial activities. In Karigar, the Court appeared to have little difficulty finding that the officers of Air India, a government-owned entity, constituted foreign public officials.
Lastly, there appears to be a low threshold to prove a “real and substantial link” between the offence and Canada in order for a Canadian Court to have jurisdiction under the Act. Importantly, the Court held that the bribery conduct could not be separated from the “legitimate aspects” of the underlying transaction when considering whether or not a Canadian court has jurisdiction. In Karigar, the Court found the following factors sufficient to give the Ontario court jurisdiction despite the fact that the bribe was not made in Canada and Cryptometrics’ senior officials who approved the bribe were in the US: Cryptometrics was a Canadian company; Mr. Karigar had been a Canadian businessman; he was employed by or acted as an agent for Cryptometrics; the conspiracy was to obtain an unfair advantage to a Canadian company (or a significant Canadian component of an international company); and much of the work under the contract would have taken place in Canada. The Court also referred to Canada’s obligations as a signatory under the international Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions as a reason to make sure an overly restrictive approach to jurisdiction does not thwart effective enforcement of the Act.
Conclusion
The conviction in Karigar is a reminder to Canadian companies operating abroad that Canadian authorities have increased their enforcement of the Act, and that Canadian Courts may take a broad view of what constitutes an offence under the Act. Karigar reinforces the need for a robust compliance program so that employees and foreign agents of companies connected to Canada are aware of, and adhere to, a policy that prohibits paying or offering bribes to foreign public officials.
Insights
-
REITS and Income Securities
The Legal Industry Reviews Edition 5 - REITs Chapter
Stephen Pincus, Brenda Gosselin, and Bill Gorman have co-authored The Canadian REIT Structure in the fifth edition of The Legal Industry Reviews Canada.To view the… -
Financial Services Regulatory
Canadian Securities Administrators Extend Compliance Deadline in Interim Approach to Value-Referenced Crypto Assets
On April 17, 2024, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) provided an update to their interim approach in respect of “Value-Referenced Crypto Assets” (VRCAs), as set out in the CSA’s guidance in… -
Financial Services Regulatory
Obligations and Opportunity - Budget 2024’s Impact on the Blockchain Industry
As crypto-assets become subject to further regulation both domestically and globally, industry players find themselves presented not only with new obligations but also with new opportunities. Canada’s… -
Capital Markets
Public Safety Canada Releases Updated Guidance on Modern Slavery Reporting Obligations
The Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act (the “Act”) came into force on January 1, 2024, implementing enhanced reporting requirements for certain entities to… -
Capital Markets
Ontario Court of Appeal Enforces Contractual Waiver of Statutory Dissent Rights
Ontario’s Court of Appeal concluded in a recent decision that, subject to limited exceptions, shareholders can contractually waive statutory “dissent rights”, which allow shareholders to dissent in… -
Capital Markets
CSA Provides Further Updated Guidance on Virtual Shareholder Meetings
On February 22, 2024, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) recently published updated guidance on virtual shareholder meetings following initial guidance provided in February 2022. See…
Featured Work
-
Capital Markets
RioCan REIT issues private placement offering of $300 million debentures
Goodmans LLP advised RioCan REIT in connection with a transaction that involved a brokered private placement offering of $300 million principal amount of Series AK senior unsecured debentures by… -
Mining
Hudbay Minerals completes US$402 million bought deal equity offering
Goodmans LLP advised Hudbay Minerals Inc. in the public offering of its common shares for aggregate gross proceeds of US$402,477,000, including the full exercise of the underwriters’ overallotment… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Screaming Eagle merges with Lionsgate Studios
Goodmans LLP acted for Screaming Eagle Acquisition Corp. in connection with its merger with the Studio Business of Lionsgate Entertainment Corp., comprised of its Television Studio and Motion Picture… -
Capital Markets
Dye & Durham’s defence of requisition from Engine Capital
Goodmans LLP is acting for the board of Dye & Durham in connection with a defence of requisition from Engine Capital… -
Capital Markets
Board of WonderFi Technologies Inc.’s proxy defense from KAOS Capital and Mogo
Goodmans LLP is acting for the special committee of the board of WonderFi Technologies Inc in connection with its defense of a proxy contest launched by KAOS Capital and MOGO. KAOS Capital is a… -
Tax
Cineplex announces comprehensive refinancing plan
Goodmans LLP is acting for Cineplex Inc., a leading Canadian entertainment and media company, in connection with its announcement of a comprehensive refinancing plan to improve financial flexibility…
News & Events
-
Banking and Financial Services
Goodmans Lawyers Recognized in the Lexpert Special Edition: Finance and M&A 2024
We are delighted to announce the Lexpert Special Edition: Finance and M&A 2024 once again features Goodmans lawyers among Canada's experts.Congratulations to our 33 featured lawyers:Alan… -
Banking and Financial Services
The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory 2024 Continues to Recognize Goodmans
We are proud to announce Goodmans LLP has once again been recognized in the 2024 edition of The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory.91 Goodmans lawyers have been recognized as top-tier in their… -
Banking and Financial Services
Chambers and Partners Continues to Honour Goodmans with Global Recognition
We are proud to announce Goodmans LLP has once again received top-tier recognition from Chambers and Partners in the Chambers Global 2024 Guide released today. Recognition from…