Canadian Securities Administrators Seek Public Comment on Activist Short Selling
The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) recently issued a consultation paper (the “Consultation Paper”) seeking feedback on a broad range of issues related to “activist short selling”. Activist short sellers attempt to profit by taking a short position in a security and then publicly disclosing information expected to cause a decline in the security’s market price. The Consultation Paper compares and contrasts Canadian and international regulatory frameworks for short selling generally, summarizes stakeholder concerns about activist short selling, and sets out CSA Staff’s findings regarding the nature and extent of activist short selling in Canada. The CSA are accepting comments on the Consultation Paper until March 3, 2021.
Activist Short Selling in Canada
As part of its research, the CSA conducted an empirical analysis of 116 activist short seller campaigns targeting Canadian issuers between 2010 and September 2020, as well as a review of the academic literature. The CSA conclude:
- Between 2010 and September 2020, a total of 73 Canadian issuers were the target of 116 activist short seller campaigns, 16 of which remain active.
- Activist short seller activity has increased in Canada since 2015, on average.
- Annually, there have been no more than five Canadian targets for every 1,000 Canadian listed issuers. By comparison, in the U.S., there have been 21 targets annually for every 1,000 U.S. listed issuers.
- Activist short sellers in Canada have historically gravitated towards sectors where there is perceived overvaluation.
- Canadian campaigns have tended to focus on larger issuers, with the target issuers having a median market capitalization of $867 million and average market capitalization of $4.5 billion.
- Approximately 75% of the issuers subject to an activist short seller campaign experienced a negative price impact on the day of the first campaign announcement and up to one month after the first campaign announcement, although the extent of the short-term price impact varied across targets and over time.
- Approximately 40% of all campaigns studied involved allegations of some type of fraud at the issuer, the most common being allegations of a stock promotion scheme.
Canadian Regulatory Framework
In most Canadian jurisdictions, there is no specific regulation that addresses the activities of activist short sellers or the form or content of their public statements. Securities regulations prohibiting market manipulation, misleading statements and fraud apply to all market participants, including activist short sellers. In addition, the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) administers a regime that regulates short selling as a trading activity, including a prohibition on “naked” short selling (selling securities without access to the securities required to settle the trade) and a requirement for dealers to report their aggregate short positions twice a month.
In contrast to certain foreign jurisdictions such as the European Union and Australia, Canadian securities regulation does not require the reporting or disclosure of the positions or identity of individual short sellers. Unlike in Canada, some foreign jurisdictions also provide a private right of action against those who contravene prohibitions on false or misleading statements, which could include activist short sellers.
In the Consultation Paper, the CSA acknowledge that questions have been raised about the effectiveness of existing enforcement tools for addressing potentially problematic activist short selling activities, given the limited number of regulatory proceedings in Canada arising from the conduct of activist short sellers.
Key Issues for Consultation
The CSA are soliciting feedback from stakeholders on a broad range of issues set out in the Consultation Paper, including:
- examples of conduct in activist short selling campaigns that may be problematic;
- whether Canadian issuers are more vulnerable to potentially problematic activist short-selling activities as compared to issuers in other jurisdictions (including in light of the size and types of issuers, industries, sectors, or other Canadian-specific market conditions);
- the ability of issuers to respond to allegations made in an activist short selling campaign;
- whether the existing Canadian regulatory framework is adequate to address the risks associated with problematic activist short selling;
- whether existing enforcement and remedial mechanisms adequately deter problematic activist short selling in Canada; and
- whether Canada should adopt relevant regulatory requirements sourced from other jurisdictions.
The CSA note there are competing views on many of these issues and no general consensus as to the path forward. At this stage, the CSA are focused on consulting with various market participants and stakeholders. The Consultation Paper does not advocate for any specific regulatory proposals or outcomes.
Authors
Insights
-
Capital Markets
Clarification on Rules Relating to the Removal of Directors by Shareholders
In OneMove Capital Corporation v. Dye & Durham Limited (“OneMove v. D&D”), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (the “Court”) held that shareholders may not submit a proposal under section… -
Shareholder Activism
'The Shareholder Activism Phenomenon is Strong and Will Remain Strong for the Foreseeable Future', Lexpert
In a recent article for Lexpert.ca, author Jonathan Feldman discusses the state of shareholder activism in Canada and delves into what's top-of-mind for him as we head into the 2024 proxy… -
Shareholder Activism
Canadian Securities Administrators Seek Public Comment on Activist Short Selling
The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) recently issued a consultation paper (the “Consultation Paper”) seeking feedback on a broad range of issues related to “activist short selling”. Activist… -
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
Advance Notice By-Laws – A Canadian Shield
In BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd., the Delaware Supreme Court recently provided guidance on the validity of supplemental disclosure obligations imposed on… -
Capital Markets
Glass Lewis Releases 2020 Canadian Proxy Voting Guidelines
Proxy advisor Glass, Lewis & Co. recently released its 2020 Canadian Guidelines to Proxy Advice. These policy guidelines generally apply to shareholder meetings beginning in 2020, and the… -
Capital Markets
The Legal Status of Board Observers in Canada
As part of an equity investment or financing transaction, investors often seek the right to appoint a board observer in addition to or in place of receiving an actual seat on a company’s board. These…
Featured Work
-
Shareholder Activism
Browning West achieves landmark victory in Gildan Activewear proxy campaign
Goodmans LLP acted for Browning West, LP in the successful reconstitution of Gildan Activewear’s entire board, culminating in the reinstatement of CEO Glenn Chamandy… -
Shareholder Activism
FINSIGHT Group Inc. announces intent to vote against Q4 Inc’s proposed plan to be acquired by Sumeru Equity Partners
Goodmans LLP is acting for FINSIGHT Group Inc in connection with issuing a letter to the board of directors of Q4 Inc, announcing that it intends to vote AGAINST the Q4 Inc’s proposed plan of… -
Shareholder Activism
Dye & Durham’s defence of requisition from Engine Capital
Goodmans LLP is acting for the board of Dye & Durham in connection with a defence of requisition from Engine Capital… -
Shareholder Activism
Board of WonderFi Technologies Inc.’s proxy defense from KAOS Capital and Mogo
Goodmans LLP acted for the special committee of the board of WonderFi Technologies Inc in connection with its defense of a proxy contest launched by KAOS Capital and MOGO. KAOS Capital is a… -
Shareholder Activism
Aimia Inc.'s largest shareholder, Mithaq, plans takeover bid
Goodmans LLP is acting for Aimia Inc., The Special Committee of the Board of Directors, in connection with a takeover bid for Aimia by Mithaq Capital, the company's largest shareholder… -
Shareholder Activism
Magnet Forensics acquired by Thoma Bravo
Goodmans LLP acted for Nellore Capital Management, the largest shareholder of Subordinate Voting Shares of Magnet Forensics, in relation to Thoma Bravo’s proposed acquisition of Magnet Forensics…
News & Events
-
Shareholder Activism
Jon Feldman featured in "Behind the Scenes: The ISS Dress Rehearsal", The Deal
Goodmans partner Jon Feldman shares his insights in the article published by The Deal, "Behind the Scenes: The ISS Dress Rehearsal". "Normally in Canada you have two or three people… -
- 10:00 AM Shareholder Activism
Activewear Activism: Decoding the Gildan Proxy Battle
Together with Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP, we invite you to an exclusive breakfast session at Goodmans LLP this Fall.Join us for an in-depth discussion with the team behind the Gildan Proxy battle, which… -
Shareholder Activism
Jon Feldman featured in "Lawyer who took on Gildan's board sheds light on bitter corporate battle", The Globe and Mail
In an article published in The Globe and Mail, Goodmans partner Jon Feldman shares his insights in "Lawyer who took on Gildan's board sheds light on bitter corporate battle". "When Gildan…